Important Ladies’s Well being Assets: The place to Discover Proof-Based mostly Info

Please notice: On this article, the time period ‘ladies’ is used inclusively to embody all people who menstruate or have menstruated, no matter gender identity.

Let’s be clear: Entry to actual, evidence-based well being data shouldn’t be controversial—however right here we’re.

In a political local weather the place ladies’s our bodies are continuously below fireplace, the quiet erasure of greater than 8,000 pages from federal well being web sites isn’t simply suspicious—it’s harmful.

These aren’t simply random webpages; they’re important assets on the whole lot from contraception and maternal mortality to LGBTQ+ youth well being and medical trial variety. The sort of data that saves lives, helps suppliers, and empowers folks to make knowledgeable decisions about their our bodies.

And now? It’s gone—scrubbed from websites just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA with little clarification and nil accountability. If that appears like a battle on ladies, properly… you’re not unsuitable.

When politics begins dictating what well being data we’re allowed to entry, it’s as much as us to combat again. Meaning getting louder, getting smarter, and turning to unbiased, science-backed women’s health resources that put public well being earlier than political agendas. As a result of nobody—not a politician, not a bureaucrat—will get to determine what we do or don’t need to find out about our personal rattling our bodies.

Why Authorities-Equipped Well being Data is Disappearing

For many years, federal well being businesses just like the NIH, CDC, and FDA had been go-to sources for reliable medical data. However in latest months, one thing alarming has occurred behind the scenes: 1000’s of pages of ladies’s well being content material have quietly vanished.

This isn’t a coincidence—it’s a calculated shift.

Right here’s what’s been eliminated, why it issues, and who’s being harmed probably the most.

What’s Been Eliminated and Why It Issues

Entry to complete, research-based well being and wellness data is crucial to the well-being of ladies. But the U.S. authorities has not too long ago modified or eliminated greater than 8,000 pages^1,2,4 from federal well being web sites—severely limiting entry to essential medical steering.

These deletions have an effect on assets from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH), the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), and the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). This contains important public well being data on matters resembling HIV and sexually transmitted illnesses, contraceptive utilization and security, medical trial variety, maternal mortality and morbidity, transgender well being, and LGBTQ+ youth well being.^1,2,3,4.

Who This Impacts Most

The suppression of this data disproportionately impacts ladies, minorities, and different marginalized people.

With out these assets, sufferers, healthcare suppliers, and researchers face important challenges in making knowledgeable choices about remedy choices, preventive care, and wellness methods.

Eradicating this content material doesn’t simply prohibit entry to information—it undermines progress in gender-specific medical analysis and healthcare fairness.

[SIDEBAR: In December 2024, a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) found that the NIH has consistently failed to prioritize and fund research on women’s health.⁶ The report called for an additional $16 billion in funding to close the gap.But with the current administration’s clear bias—and what some are calling an outright war on women—the likelihood of that funding materializing is slim to none.]

Luckily, there are advocates on the market working to archive this data and make it out there to the general public⁵. This article comprises an inventory of those recovered assets.

The Political Undermining of Public Well being

Whereas the transition of presidency from one social gathering to a different shouldn’t have an effect on the supply of evidence-based well being and wellness data, it has. This alarming pattern highlights the pressing want for unbiased, non-governmental sources of evidence-based well being assets.

The Function of Advocacy Organizations

Fortunately, not all hope is misplaced. Organizations just like the Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR) are main the cost to guard and advance ladies’s well being by way of coverage, schooling, and science.

For instance, SWHR is dedicated to making sure that the “Sex as a Biological Variable” coverage stays in place on the NIH—a essential step in making certain that illnesses, therapies, and medical interventions are researched with ladies’s distinctive physiology in thoughts.

The well being wants of ladies change throughout the lifespan, from reproductive years by way of menopause and past, making entry to stage-specific, research-backed assets much more essential.

Trusted, Proof-Based mostly Ladies’s Well being Assets

Under is a curated checklist of evidence-based, non-governmental assets. These organizations present science-backed steering tailor-made to the distinctive well being issues of ladies of their reproductive years, in the course of the menopausal transition, and post-menopause. By looking for out and sharing these assets, we will collectively safeguard entry to important well being information and be sure that all ladies have the knowledge they should thrive at each stage of life.

Teen/Reproductive Years: 

Reproductive Health Access Project
Trains and helps major care clinicians to develop entry to reproductive well being care—together with abortion, contraception, and miscarriage care. Gives free, multilingual, evidence-based affected person schooling supplies and advocates for fairness in medical coaching and care.

Perimenopause/Menopause:

The North American Menopause Society
A number one unbiased group providing evidence-based data on menopause and midlife ladies’s well being. A trusted useful resource for each healthcare suppliers and the general public.

A number of Life Levels:

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
A go-to supply for dependable, science-backed ladies’s well being data. Empowers sufferers to have knowledgeable conversations with their ob-gyn and take an lively function of their care.

Planned Parenthood
A nationwide chief in accessible sexual and reproductive healthcare and schooling. Advocates for inexpensive, high-quality companies and is the most important supplier of intercourse schooling within the U.S.

Our Bodies Ourselves
Gives rigorously vetted well being and sexuality data that integrates medical experience with lived expertise. Prioritizes inclusivity and facilities the voices of ladies and gender-expansive people.

Healthy Women
Targeted on ladies aged 35 to 64, this group supplies medically reviewed, evidence-based content material that helps wholesome growing older and empowered self-advocacy.

Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Women’s Mental Health: Reproductive Psychiatry Resource & Information Center
Gives reproductive psychiatry assets throughout life levels, with specialised help for BIPOC people looking for culturally aligned care.

Center for Science in the Public Interest
A science-based advocacy group selling public well being by way of vitamin, meals coverage reform, and transparency. Prioritizes illness prevention and meals fairness.

Take Cost: Keep Knowledgeable, Keep Empowered

In a time when entry to reliable well being data is being stripped away, staying knowledgeable isn’t simply vital—it’s a type of resistance. Each particular person deserves science-backed, inclusive assets that help knowledgeable decisions, not political agendas.

So bookmark these hyperlinks. Share them with your pals, your purchasers, your healthcare suppliers. Help the organizations doing the exhausting work to maintain this data alive. And above all, don’t let anybody let you know that your well being isn’t price combating for. As a result of it’s. All the time. —Karin

References

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/02/upshot/trump-government-websites-missing-pages.html
2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/federal-agencies-websites-trump/
3. https://swhr.org/a-january-2025-policy-recap-from-swhr/
4. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-drops-web-pages-improving-clinical-trial-diversity-2025-01-24/
5. https://contrarian.substack.com/p/public-health-websites-are-going
6. https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-needs-new-institute-women-s-health-research-expert-panel-says